||
Previous Lecture ||
Next Lecture ||
Assignments ||
CTL3211
SEMANTICS
Office: Rm B7610; Phone: 2788 8795; Email:
cthpan@cityu.edu.hk
Meaning, Thought, and Reality
1. Reference
- The action of picking out or identifying with words is often called referring or denoting,
for examples, Paris refers to or denotes the city, John refers to the person
who is named John. The entity referred to is usually called the referent.
- John Lyons separate the terms refer from denote. Denote is
used for the relationship between a linguistic expression and the world, while refer is
used for the action of a speaker in picking out the entities in the world. Referring
is what the speakers do, but denoting is a property of words. Only some of the noun
phrases can have referents, but all the non-functional words and phrases have denotations.
- Noun phrases have the following subtypes: definite noun phrase (also called definite
description), indefinite noun phrase, bare noun phrases, names, and pronouns (including
demonstratives)
- Types of reference:
--- referring/non-referring expressions:
nominals (noun phrases and names) are usually referring expressions,
but words like very, so, bad, are not referring expressions. An indefinite
noun phrase has a referring and a non-referring use.
--- constant/variable reference: Usually
pronouns have variable reference, but definite NPs can also have variable
reference, for example, the President of the US. Variable reference depends
on
context, and pronouns with contextual dependency are called deixis.
- The term extension of an expression is the set of which could possibly be the
referent of that expression. This is the same as the denotation of an expression mentioned
earlier.
- Readings a noun phrase can have: referential, specific, distributive, collective,
generic, etc (See more about different readings of NPs here.).
2. Referential/Denotational vs. Representational Approaches
- Reference as a theory of meaning: Semantics is reference, the so-called referential
approach
proper names |
denote |
individuals |
common nouns |
denote |
set of individuals |
verbs |
" |
actions |
adjectives |
" |
property of individuals |
adverbs |
" |
property of actions |
- Problems for the referential approach is (a) not all the linguistic expressions have
reference; (b) nominals like a unicorn, will never have a reference; (c) no
one-to-one correspondence for referring expressions: names, definite descriptions, etc.;
and (d) two expressions can refer to the same individual, but with meaning differences,
i.e. different senses. Big question: How can we talk about imaginary and hypothetical
entities or situations? Can we differentiate x is x and x is y but x happens to be y?
- Representational approach: emphasize the link between language and conceptual
structure. See more below.
3. Mental Representations
- Senses: place a new level between words and worlds, i.e. a level of mental
representation. So a noun is said to gain its ability to denote because it is associated
with something in the speaker/hearer's mind.
- The question is: what these mental representations are? Images, concepts, or something
else?
- Sufficient and necessary conditions: (a) If X is a sufficient condition for Y, then X
entails Y; (b) If X is a necessary condition for Y, then if not X, then not Y.
- Defining concepts with necessary and sufficient conditions, and viewing concepts as a
list of bits of knowledge. Problems are: (a) if we share the same concept, then we should
agree on the necessary and sufficient conditions for the concept, which is proven to be
difficult to set up the conditions even for nouns which identify concrete and natural kind
like dog and table; (b) identifying which are necessary and which are
sufficient conditions is no easy task; (c) speakers often use words they know very little
to refer to entities, so it is difficult to say that they know the necessary and
sufficient conditions of the concept in question.
- Prototype theory for concepts: there are central or typical members of a concept.
Advantage: allows borderline uncertainty.
- Relations between concepts, conceptual hierarchy model.
|| CTL3211
Main Page || Syllabus
|| Schedule ||
Comments to: cthpan@cityu.edu.hk
Last updated by Haihua Pan, 13 Jan. 2004